Banca de DEFESA: PAULO MATEUS DE MORAES

Uma banca de DEFESA de MESTRADO foi cadastrada pelo programa.
DISCENTE : PAULO MATEUS DE MORAES
DATA : 05/08/2022
HORA: 08:00
LOCAL: Remota - meet.google.com
TÍTULO:

SUBJECT, MEMORY AND IDENTITIES

“DECRIMINALIZATION OF THE HOMOTRANSPHOBIA”

PALAVRAS-CHAVES:

Legal Discourse; Discursive Operation; Identities; Homotransphobia.

PÁGINAS: 122
GRANDE ÁREA: Lingüística, Letras e Artes
ÁREA: Lingüística
RESUMO:

This dissertation is based on the line of “Discourse Processes Studies”, which is part of the Postgraduate Program in Linguistics at the Mato Grosso State University (PPGL/UNEMAT). From the perspective of Discourse Analysis, as precursors of these studies: Michel Pêcheux (1960), in France, and Eni Orlandi (1980), in Brazil; we develop the theme: tensions in/of the legal discourse of criminalization of homotransphobia. Based on the movements produced by disagreements and contradictories, we were led to think about the tensions between the parties that presided over the trial of the Writ of Injunction (MI 4733) and Direct action of Unconstitutionality for Omission – ADO 26, both processed in the Federal Supreme Court (STF), in 2019. In this way, we sought to analyze how legal discourse works based on the oral arguments presented by the subject-lawyers, focusing on a central issue: what way of the homotransphobia criminalization was understood by subject-lawyers who presided over the trial? Thus, raise the attention the excessive repetition of words in the enunciations, as in the use of the pronouns "I, we and they", in their different ways of establishing the interlocution and in the exercise of (de)marcate places in language disputes. These marks, excesses and resumptions in the linguistic materiality, led us to undertake a guided Reading throught on the thesis of the lawyer who proposed the lawsuit, and based in three oral arguments presented by Amicus Curiae, composed by two lawyers who represented the Mixed Parliamentary Front for Family and Life Support (FPMFAV), and one that was representing the National Association of Evangelical Jurists (Anajure). After our analyses, we believe that there are different meanings produced in the way subject-lawyers are taken to mean the criminalization of homotransphobia; already the operation of the pronouns produces limits, differences, and referents from the positions assumed by the subject-advocates in the discourse.Such differences and meanings are derived from the processes of interpellation and identification with different ideologies. Moreover, we consider that certain subject-positions were unfolded in the gestures of retaking the sacred words (Holy Bible), and the words of the Law (fundamental rights), in order for the subject-attorneys to support the request for (un)founded the criminalization suit.

MEMBROS DA BANCA:
Presidente - 101625005 - FLAVIO ROBERTO GOMES BENITES
Interno - 537.334.289-00 - ELIANA DE ALMEIDA - UNEMAT
Externo à Instituição - MARCOS AURELIO BARBAI - UNICAMP